Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

This is where record cutters raise questions about cutting, and trade wisdom and experiment results. We love Scully, Neumann, Presto, & Rek-O-Kut lathes and Wilcox-Gay Recordios (among others). We are excited by the various modern pro and semi-pro systems, too, in production and development. We use strange, extinct disc-based dictation machines. And other stuff, too.

Moderators: piaptk, tragwag, Steve E., Aussie0zborn

Post Reply
User avatar
MBL
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:51 am

Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

Post: # 27242Unread post MBL
Tue Sep 24, 2013 12:18 pm

Howdy all. Since this is kinda specific, I added a new thread. Does anyone know what the difference is between the Presto 160A and the 190A equalizer attachments? I know the 160A also needs either a switch box or a rack mounted companion, but I don't know if a 190A does. Is anyone using one of these for 33 1/3 RPM recordings?
Thanks for any insight!
Tim
MBL

User avatar
tragwag
Posts: 1265
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:30 pm
Location: Providence, RI USA
Contact:

Re: Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

Post: # 27254Unread post tragwag
Tue Sep 24, 2013 5:47 pm

I've never seen anyone use either of these.
I always use the computer EQ with automation.
Though I can understand for your analog setup you would want the Presto auto-EQ.
making lathe cuts on a Presto 6N, HIFI stereo cuts on vinylrecorder
at Audio Geography Studios, Providence, RI USA
http://www.audiogeography.com

User avatar
MBL
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:51 am

Re: Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

Post: # 27284Unread post MBL
Fri Sep 27, 2013 7:32 am

Yeah. I'd at least like to get it working to see all what it does. I have a 190A slder unit and a switch box, but the 3 deck switch got busted pretty good. Anyone know how I can find a replacement? Or perhaps someone on here may have a switch unit they'd part with?
Tim
MBL

User avatar
Steve E.
Site Admin
Posts: 1928
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Brooklyn, New York, USA
Contact:

Re: Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

Post: # 27917Unread post Steve E.
Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:53 am

Tim, I might. I have no idea if it works. Be in touch.

EDIT: Ooops. what I have is the slider unit. Well, be in touch anyway. send pix of what you have.

User avatar
Steve E.
Site Admin
Posts: 1928
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Brooklyn, New York, USA
Contact:

Re: Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

Post: # 27918Unread post Steve E.
Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:03 am

Here's something....there was a 92A cutter amp. Then there was a 92B cutter amp. My understanding of the difference between them is that the 92B has the EQ circuitry integrated into it. Perhaps the difference in these EQ units corresponds to that difference.

For others who have NO idea what we are talking about.....

The Presto 6N, which was a classic radio transcription cutting lathe of the 1940s and 50s, cut at 78 rpm and 33 1/3 rpm. It could cut outside-in and inside-out, and it was designed to cut 16" discs for radio.

Well! In the era before stylus heating and vacuuming of the swarf (cut threads), there was a real problem on 33.33 RPM as you moved toward or away from the middle of the disc. The inner grooves sounded dull. There was less high end.

So their solution was a sliding unit that would adjust the EQ as the cutterhead moved to the middle of the disc. It cranked the high end, basically, gradually. Kinda brilliant solution.

User avatar
MBL
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:51 am

Re: Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

Post: # 27933Unread post MBL
Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:10 am

I have a slider unit and the switch unit. Mine is the 190-A Slider. The switch unit appears to have selections for frequency ranges...and the switch also has a provision that would make it so two turntables could be filtered through the range feature. My switch for the frequency range is busted up.
Tim
MBL

User avatar
MBL
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:51 am

Re: Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

Post: # 27934Unread post MBL
Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:20 am

The EQ may be a project for down the road a bit. I think getting the cutter working at 78 rpm will be a feat in itself. I should be close to this at some point in the coming months.
Tim
MBL

User avatar
Steve E.
Site Admin
Posts: 1928
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Brooklyn, New York, USA
Contact:

Re: Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

Post: # 27937Unread post Steve E.
Wed Nov 27, 2013 11:31 am

please post pix!

User avatar
MBL
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:51 am

Re: Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

Post: # 27948Unread post MBL
Thu Nov 28, 2013 8:20 am

Pics for Steve!

Image

Image

Image

Image

The slider unit is actually intact. And the switch unit, has damage related to the rotary switch only that I can see. I might be inclined to buy another whole switching unit to copy, but it might just be a distraction from themain goal. I do like to make things the way they were originally intended. The switch unit seems to be designed in such a way as to be used with two sliders and turntables. Extended recording seems to be the goal here with that functionality. My focus is to record some traditional rockabilly on acetate...so. eh.
Tim
MBL

User avatar
MBL
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:51 am

Re: Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

Post: # 27949Unread post MBL
Thu Nov 28, 2013 8:28 am

Image

This is a SA-9 switch. The functionality of this would be to have two turntables hooked up to one recording amp. The moment you run out of space on the first table, the switch will swap the power and signal to the other table waiting for use. I believe this type of unit was used on lathes and tape decks. Likely will not be used as intended, but still cool to have.
Tim
MBL

User avatar
Steve E.
Site Admin
Posts: 1928
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:24 pm
Location: Brooklyn, New York, USA
Contact:

Re: Presto 160A and 190A Equalizers...Differences

Post: # 27951Unread post Steve E.
Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:50 pm

Consider that it was typical for a radio station to have two 6Ns. One was set up to record out to in, the other to record in to out (typically...though that was especially to minimize the EQ difference between the out and the in, so maybe this unit reduced the need for the different directions). They were recording live programs, either for their archives or for rebroadcast later. I'm guessing that was connected to the purpose of the switching box.

Post Reply