- marc_parazon
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:00 pm
Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
Hello
I am an 'experimental' musician and a 'sound artist' in the sense that apart from concert I make sound installations.
I am currently working on a sound installation with gramophone playing 78 rpm records and I wish to make a record of my own music that I could play on it.
The problem with gramophone is that (and I guess you know that better than I do) It cannot play microgroove.
Therefore , i was wondering if you could help me on that : I wish to press a vinyl or shellac or whatever record of my own music that could be played on a gramophone.
Let me know
Regards
I am an 'experimental' musician and a 'sound artist' in the sense that apart from concert I make sound installations.
I am currently working on a sound installation with gramophone playing 78 rpm records and I wish to make a record of my own music that I could play on it.
The problem with gramophone is that (and I guess you know that better than I do) It cannot play microgroove.
Therefore , i was wondering if you could help me on that : I wish to press a vinyl or shellac or whatever record of my own music that could be played on a gramophone.
Let me know
Regards
- Steve E.
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:24 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, New York, USA
- Contact:
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
I encouraged Marc to post this in the "Pressing Shellac Records?" thread, but this is a great post that deserves to be stickied. Why?
*It's a question that is coming to my doorstep, offsite, increasingly (people are also joining the forum to ask this sort of question).
*It's one of the questions that led me to start this site, in 2005. Nearly 12 years later, it remains one of the more difficult problems to solve satisfactorily.
First of all, it KINDA can be done. I'll show a video of me doing it later in the thread.
Here are the problems which must be considered.
Part 1: Hardness of record. Shellac (not vinyl) pressing is needed if disposable one-play steel needles are used.
1) 78 records were traditionally made of shellac. Shellac is MUCH harder than vinyl, and harder than the materials like makrolon polycarbonate that are used for some kinds of one-off "Lathe Cuts." It is also MUCH harder than acetate. If you intent to play a record using a traditional steel needle and a traditional incredibly heavy reproducer arm, the material must be shellac, or something that hard. (I suppose there were some home aluminium records. I suspect they were impossibly noisy.) If it's modern vinyl, the steel will stop the record after gouging it.
2) I would love to be corrected, but based on the topic "Pressing Shellac Records?" I don't think anyone is currently _pressing_ shellac. Any labels issuing 78 rpm records are probably issuing them on vinyl, which will be torn up by a gramophone with a steel needle.
3) Familiarize yourself with the difference between a "pressed" record and a "lathe-cut" record. "Pressed" records are generally mass-produced, and involved a complex process of:
a) cutting a master into a very soft material (acetate),
b) making an electroformed metal "negative" of the record, and
c) installing this into a pressing machine where harder copies are stamped from this negative, from molten materials.
Even if you had presses that were set up to handle shellac (and that's a big if), it would be a complex process for just one record.
I am unaware of any way to do a one-off cut directly into shellac. The whole point of shellac is to resist being cut into.
more....
*It's a question that is coming to my doorstep, offsite, increasingly (people are also joining the forum to ask this sort of question).
*It's one of the questions that led me to start this site, in 2005. Nearly 12 years later, it remains one of the more difficult problems to solve satisfactorily.
Let's be sure that we are clear about the desired result. marc_parazon wants a record that will play on a non-electric, or "acoustic", hand-cranked machine that plays lateral-grooved 78 rpm records of the RCA Victor variety.marc_parazon wrote:Therefore , i was wondering if you could help me on that : I wish to press a vinyl or shellac or whatever record of my own music that could be played on a gramophone.
First of all, it KINDA can be done. I'll show a video of me doing it later in the thread.
Here are the problems which must be considered.
Part 1: Hardness of record. Shellac (not vinyl) pressing is needed if disposable one-play steel needles are used.
1) 78 records were traditionally made of shellac. Shellac is MUCH harder than vinyl, and harder than the materials like makrolon polycarbonate that are used for some kinds of one-off "Lathe Cuts." It is also MUCH harder than acetate. If you intent to play a record using a traditional steel needle and a traditional incredibly heavy reproducer arm, the material must be shellac, or something that hard. (I suppose there were some home aluminium records. I suspect they were impossibly noisy.) If it's modern vinyl, the steel will stop the record after gouging it.
2) I would love to be corrected, but based on the topic "Pressing Shellac Records?" I don't think anyone is currently _pressing_ shellac. Any labels issuing 78 rpm records are probably issuing them on vinyl, which will be torn up by a gramophone with a steel needle.
3) Familiarize yourself with the difference between a "pressed" record and a "lathe-cut" record. "Pressed" records are generally mass-produced, and involved a complex process of:
a) cutting a master into a very soft material (acetate),
b) making an electroformed metal "negative" of the record, and
c) installing this into a pressing machine where harder copies are stamped from this negative, from molten materials.
Even if you had presses that were set up to handle shellac (and that's a big if), it would be a complex process for just one record.
I am unaware of any way to do a one-off cut directly into shellac. The whole point of shellac is to resist being cut into.
more....
- Steve E.
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:24 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, New York, USA
- Contact:
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
Part 2: Alternatives to pressing a shellac record.
So, I know of no cases of anyone who has pressed a shellac record since, maybe, India in the 1960's. In all likelihood, you will need to go another route.
The alternative to pressed records is "lathe-cut" records. This is to say: The step of cutting the grooves into the record produces the finished record (instead of producing a master used to generate stampers for pressings, etc). The resulting record will almost certainly be softer than shellac.
Here is a video of me, with Amy X Neuburg, cutting records which were played back immediately on gramophones, while wearing a ridiculous Chippendale-ish thing that was supposed to represent a 1920's vaudeville outfit, somehow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVvtlk0qu6A 1) What I did: I cut into Apollo or Transco-brand acetate dubplates. I was using a home-cutter from the 1940s, with some NOS 1940's stylus in it. (It was probably a Stellite standard-groove stylus. We'll come back to that.)
**CRUCIAL: Playback was with milled CACTUS NEEDLES. Peter Dilg gave me this tip. A steel needle would have torn right through this, but Greythorne-brand (or RCA Brand) shaped cactus needles will play records made of most materials softer than shellac. You will also need a cactus needle sharpener to maintain the tips. Both can be found on ebay.
Problems with what I did: Acetates are VERY soft. They are designed to give way when a sharp instrument cuts a groove into 'em... that's how you get high frequency response. So, while this particular playback in the video sounds great, these records would be unlistenable after roughly 6 plays--maybe a few more plays on a very well-maintained and well-designed UK Columbia or HMV machine, rubber gaskets all replaced, etc. Even with cactus needles, the sound will be torn off the record, soon enough.
2) So, the other alts would be some sort of cut into a more durable plastic material, using a diamond stylus instead of a standard sapphire. There are several users on the site offering these services. I do not believe services that involve embossing (vs cutting) will work in this particular project.
To be clear: None of these techniques involve cutting into the vinyl used in a pressing. that's a different, much harder material. These generally involve some other sorts of hardish plastic blanks.
OK.... there is more but I'm zonked.... I'll continue tomorrow.
So, I know of no cases of anyone who has pressed a shellac record since, maybe, India in the 1960's. In all likelihood, you will need to go another route.
The alternative to pressed records is "lathe-cut" records. This is to say: The step of cutting the grooves into the record produces the finished record (instead of producing a master used to generate stampers for pressings, etc). The resulting record will almost certainly be softer than shellac.
Here is a video of me, with Amy X Neuburg, cutting records which were played back immediately on gramophones, while wearing a ridiculous Chippendale-ish thing that was supposed to represent a 1920's vaudeville outfit, somehow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVvtlk0qu6A 1) What I did: I cut into Apollo or Transco-brand acetate dubplates. I was using a home-cutter from the 1940s, with some NOS 1940's stylus in it. (It was probably a Stellite standard-groove stylus. We'll come back to that.)
**CRUCIAL: Playback was with milled CACTUS NEEDLES. Peter Dilg gave me this tip. A steel needle would have torn right through this, but Greythorne-brand (or RCA Brand) shaped cactus needles will play records made of most materials softer than shellac. You will also need a cactus needle sharpener to maintain the tips. Both can be found on ebay.
Problems with what I did: Acetates are VERY soft. They are designed to give way when a sharp instrument cuts a groove into 'em... that's how you get high frequency response. So, while this particular playback in the video sounds great, these records would be unlistenable after roughly 6 plays--maybe a few more plays on a very well-maintained and well-designed UK Columbia or HMV machine, rubber gaskets all replaced, etc. Even with cactus needles, the sound will be torn off the record, soon enough.
2) So, the other alts would be some sort of cut into a more durable plastic material, using a diamond stylus instead of a standard sapphire. There are several users on the site offering these services. I do not believe services that involve embossing (vs cutting) will work in this particular project.
To be clear: None of these techniques involve cutting into the vinyl used in a pressing. that's a different, much harder material. These generally involve some other sorts of hardish plastic blanks.
OK.... there is more but I'm zonked.... I'll continue tomorrow.
- Steve E.
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:24 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, New York, USA
- Contact:
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
Part 3: Groove Shapemarc_parazon wrote:The problem with gramophone is that (and I guess you know that better than I do) It cannot play microgroove.
Yes. "Standard" grooves (as found on 78 rpm records) are differently shaped than post-1948 microgrooves (as found on 33's and 45's). Standard grooves and microgrooves both typically have sides that are 87 to 90 degrees, but the radius of the bottom of the groove is much cruder or rounder (less sharp) in a standard groove. The result of this is a valley that might be a bit wider at the top without necessarily being that much deeper. The needle of a acoustic gramophone sits much higher in the groove of a 78, than an electric needle sits in a microgroove.
You can use a microgroove cutting stylus when cutting acetates and produce a record that will play OK with 78 styli and microgroove styli. This is because you can cut deep into acetate without putting much stress on the tip of the stylus.
I am not sure you can do this with vinyl cutting, and achieve the loudness or groove width you want. (I'm involved in an experiment with this right now.) Nobody (I think) is currently selling a standard-spec diamond cutting needle, and it may be dangerous to use a microgroove diamond to cut as deeply into the vinyl as you'd prefer. (it may even be impossible to put a radiused, rounded tip on a diamond cutting needle given a diamond's specific molecular structure.)
Again, the video shows me using a "standard" stylus, and a rather crude one (stellite, not sapphire) to cut into an acetate.
Onsite links about groove shape and geometry:
Request: Specs, ANY pre-1948 cutting stylus ("Standard")
Rule of thumb: Groove geometry, Depth-to-width ratio
The record you are producing should have lines-per-inch with an absolute max of 160, and that's pushing it. 112 and 120 were typical in the day, 136 was acceptable. If you are using a Souri Vinylrecorder to do this, and cut at 78 rpm, you may push the motor system beyond what it can handle for the LPI you need.... the jury is out. (and you'd need to recalculate the LPI setting by multiplying the numbers by .43 or so, since the motor pushing the head is not connected to the platter and the numbers are for 33 rpm records. (33.33/78.26 =.425)
- Steve E.
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:24 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, New York, USA
- Contact:
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
So, in summary:
*You want a lateral-groove mono record that will play at 78 rpm, will play at the now-atypical loudness of a 78, and will support both the weight of a gramophone tonearm and the radius and material of its needle (pre-1948 "Standard," non-microgroove specs).
*A "pressing" is probably not what you want if your endgame is one record for a live installation, for economic and process-time reasons
*If a "pressing" IS what you want, shellac is probably not an option anyway, at least not yet. (See "Pressing Shellac Records?") It will be vinyl.
*Any record you play on a gramophone that doesn't use shellac, whether a pressing or a lathe cut, and whether vinyl, makrolon/poly or acetate will require, for playback, a New Old Stock (NOS) cactus needle, by the Greythorne or RCA company. And a cactus needle sharpener, for repeated use of cactus needles.
*if not shellac, you have these options:
1) a "Lathe Cut" acetate record, as seen in the video. You can easily get the "Standard" groove shape; but the record is so fragile, it will last about 6 plays on a gramophone. So not ideal.
2) a "Lathe Cut" vinyl/poly record. (These aren't actually cut into the vinyl used in a vinyl pressing--that is much harder.) This will be FAR more durable, but the jury is out as to whether you can get the volume and groove width you want out of the currently-available systems designed to cut into hard vinyl. (I'll have more data on this in a week, due to a current experiment.)
3) an "embossed" poly/makrolon record. I don't believe the grooves of such a record are strong enough, or deep enough, or loud enough, for a gramophone.
4) a PRESSED vinyl record. Advantages:
a)You could have it mastered on acetate and presumably get the groove specs you need, either by cutting with a Standard cutting style or by cutting very deep and loud with a microgroove stylus.
b) And, though you'd need a cactus needle, it would play on a gramophone without wearing out as fast as an acetate.
Disadvantages:
a) as with all your other non-shellac options, you have to playback using cactus needles
b) It would cost you a LOT of money for a process that's generally designed to mass-produce records.
SO: All that said, who can help this guy?
*You want a lateral-groove mono record that will play at 78 rpm, will play at the now-atypical loudness of a 78, and will support both the weight of a gramophone tonearm and the radius and material of its needle (pre-1948 "Standard," non-microgroove specs).
*A "pressing" is probably not what you want if your endgame is one record for a live installation, for economic and process-time reasons
*If a "pressing" IS what you want, shellac is probably not an option anyway, at least not yet. (See "Pressing Shellac Records?") It will be vinyl.
*Any record you play on a gramophone that doesn't use shellac, whether a pressing or a lathe cut, and whether vinyl, makrolon/poly or acetate will require, for playback, a New Old Stock (NOS) cactus needle, by the Greythorne or RCA company. And a cactus needle sharpener, for repeated use of cactus needles.
*if not shellac, you have these options:
1) a "Lathe Cut" acetate record, as seen in the video. You can easily get the "Standard" groove shape; but the record is so fragile, it will last about 6 plays on a gramophone. So not ideal.
2) a "Lathe Cut" vinyl/poly record. (These aren't actually cut into the vinyl used in a vinyl pressing--that is much harder.) This will be FAR more durable, but the jury is out as to whether you can get the volume and groove width you want out of the currently-available systems designed to cut into hard vinyl. (I'll have more data on this in a week, due to a current experiment.)
3) an "embossed" poly/makrolon record. I don't believe the grooves of such a record are strong enough, or deep enough, or loud enough, for a gramophone.
4) a PRESSED vinyl record. Advantages:
a)You could have it mastered on acetate and presumably get the groove specs you need, either by cutting with a Standard cutting style or by cutting very deep and loud with a microgroove stylus.
b) And, though you'd need a cactus needle, it would play on a gramophone without wearing out as fast as an acetate.
Disadvantages:
a) as with all your other non-shellac options, you have to playback using cactus needles
b) It would cost you a LOT of money for a process that's generally designed to mass-produce records.
SO: All that said, who can help this guy?
- Steve E.
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:24 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, New York, USA
- Contact:
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
5) Actually, in the "Pressing Shellac Records?" thread, there is a bunch of discussion of the possibility of making your own silicon mould and creating a one-off record of some sort of hard resin. It appears someone who may live in Singapore, Lee Leng Kok, has gone quite far with this idea. So there are subjects for further research.
Other threads and links of interest:
Christov Curystanos: Molding and Casting a Record That Actually Plays
Re: Getting Started with 78s (and hand cranked players) [includes resin records discussion]
Rule of thumb: Groove geometry, Depth-to-width ratio
Request: Specs, ANY pre-1948 cutting stylus ("Standard")
Charts...Disc cutting timing per LPI at 3 speeds
THIS one is interesting and I missed it before:
DIY shellac cutting lathe
Early threads on the topic:
78 cutting styli??? (2008)
Cutting Needle for Wilcox Gay Sr (2007, outdated, some interesting discussion)
Cutting lacquers for a Victrola, playing them back. (2005, outdated)
Other threads and links of interest:
Christov Curystanos: Molding and Casting a Record That Actually Plays
Re: Getting Started with 78s (and hand cranked players) [includes resin records discussion]
Rule of thumb: Groove geometry, Depth-to-width ratio
Request: Specs, ANY pre-1948 cutting stylus ("Standard")
Charts...Disc cutting timing per LPI at 3 speeds
THIS one is interesting and I missed it before:
DIY shellac cutting lathe
Early threads on the topic:
78 cutting styli??? (2008)
Cutting Needle for Wilcox Gay Sr (2007, outdated, some interesting discussion)
Cutting lacquers for a Victrola, playing them back. (2005, outdated)
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
Hi Steve,
Regards
Soulbear
Emily :- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhvqwscTXvc demonstrates just such a technique, maybe you could cut the Lacquer with the "Larger" Stylus and then "Cast" a more durable Record after following the steps shown in this Video?? Just a Thought eh??Steve E. wrote: there is a bunch of discussion of the possibility of making your own silicon mould and creating a one-off record of some sort of hard resin.
Regards
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
I can do it! with adjustments to my Vinyl Recorder system, it's definitely possible.
shoot me an email: tragwag AT gmail DOT com
-Tyler
shoot me an email: tragwag AT gmail DOT com
-Tyler
making lathe cuts on a Presto 6N, HIFI stereo cuts on vinylrecorder
at Audio Geography Studios, Providence, RI USA
http://www.audiogeography.com
at Audio Geography Studios, Providence, RI USA
http://www.audiogeography.com
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
This may be late for you, but I just joined and wanted to add a thought. Someone mentioned making a silicone and resin casting which sounds like a good idea for making a few.
I wonder from someone who might know better if harder plastics can be used for pressing. For a living I work on copiers & printers. For gears they use a heavy duty white plastic which is rather resistant to scratches when I ran a steel point over it. It’s very similar to the plastic they used for the records they put in those talking pull string spinning toys we used to have at one time.
I wonder if you have considered cutting the groove vertically and using a jewel stylus. Judging from all the edison and pathe records left over, the majority of them have little to no wear. I think if you could afford to have specialty records custom made, it’s probably not much an added expense to get an attachment to play them. I know they aren’t to hard to find.
Well, I just wanted chip in an idea. I don’t know if it’s too late for you, but it’s here for the next person who might ask.
I wonder from someone who might know better if harder plastics can be used for pressing. For a living I work on copiers & printers. For gears they use a heavy duty white plastic which is rather resistant to scratches when I ran a steel point over it. It’s very similar to the plastic they used for the records they put in those talking pull string spinning toys we used to have at one time.
I wonder if you have considered cutting the groove vertically and using a jewel stylus. Judging from all the edison and pathe records left over, the majority of them have little to no wear. I think if you could afford to have specialty records custom made, it’s probably not much an added expense to get an attachment to play them. I know they aren’t to hard to find.
Well, I just wanted chip in an idea. I don’t know if it’s too late for you, but it’s here for the next person who might ask.
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
Gutzke's method from the 90s - considerably updated since then.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vXBCynWF_4
And its' various takeoffs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAd7_h2GjtI
Or you could try what happens when you get a flexidisc a gramophone and an Edison Diamond Disc together in a threesome
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbUKQZpnbrU
and its many offshoots thereof.
Also - if you are going for the rigid materials - any injection-mold styreme 45 plant should be able to do the same thing for whatever stiff liquid resin you end up using if you are NOT casting in silicone and replicating one copy at a time.
Trouble with the vertical cut is you'd have to stick to the 4-headed Brunswicks that are around that play lateral vertical and Pathes besides (that have a doorknob shaped stylus like a 2min cylinder).
The other thing you can try if you don't have access to a 78 size cutting stylus is to stick w the vertical but then use a 1.3-ish mil stylus and do the aforementioned Edison Diamond Disc format. That should be a little kinder to the disc due to floating head and diamond stylus - and then for that - hardened cellulose is a lot easier to get these days than shellac so that's a good substitute for the clay the original DDs were made out of and you could try that.
There's also the LP Edisons that have a tighter pitch and smaller stylus - around a mil I think to get 40 mins on a 12 inch side at 80 RPM so you could probably get away with a vertical cut on a 0.7 mil normal stereo stylus and then decide how you were going to plate and press them.
Seems like there's a lot of ideas around that could either be tried on their own or combined with other techniques to get something viable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vXBCynWF_4
And its' various takeoffs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAd7_h2GjtI
Or you could try what happens when you get a flexidisc a gramophone and an Edison Diamond Disc together in a threesome
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbUKQZpnbrU
and its many offshoots thereof.
Also - if you are going for the rigid materials - any injection-mold styreme 45 plant should be able to do the same thing for whatever stiff liquid resin you end up using if you are NOT casting in silicone and replicating one copy at a time.
Trouble with the vertical cut is you'd have to stick to the 4-headed Brunswicks that are around that play lateral vertical and Pathes besides (that have a doorknob shaped stylus like a 2min cylinder).
The other thing you can try if you don't have access to a 78 size cutting stylus is to stick w the vertical but then use a 1.3-ish mil stylus and do the aforementioned Edison Diamond Disc format. That should be a little kinder to the disc due to floating head and diamond stylus - and then for that - hardened cellulose is a lot easier to get these days than shellac so that's a good substitute for the clay the original DDs were made out of and you could try that.
There's also the LP Edisons that have a tighter pitch and smaller stylus - around a mil I think to get 40 mins on a 12 inch side at 80 RPM so you could probably get away with a vertical cut on a 0.7 mil normal stereo stylus and then decide how you were going to plate and press them.
Seems like there's a lot of ideas around that could either be tried on their own or combined with other techniques to get something viable.
2 Kinds of Men/Records: Low Noise & Wide Range. LN is mod. fidelity, cheap, & easy. WR is High Fidelity & Abrasive to its' Environment. Remember that when you encounter a Grumpy Engineer. (:-D)
- HardlyHumanFX
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:23 pm
- Location: Orange, California
- Contact:
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
Hi there,
I've been experimenting for a while and have been cutting vinyl records. I use an astatic head and I cut into vinyl with a heated diamond stylus. I basically cobbled my machine together from a bunch of others and 3D printed parts.
If you want to be able to play a vinyl cut record with a heavy phonograph tone arm, I recommend cutting on vinyl and THEN you should cast it in silicone and pour a copy in plastic. Pourable plastics from Smooth-on will work and have a shore hardness over 80, which means that the steel needle will wear down before the record--which is how it should be. Smooth on has instructions on their website for copying your own 78 records successfully with their products. It's worth a read.
That's the only way I've been able to make new phonograph 78 records so far.
Good luck
Jason
I've been experimenting for a while and have been cutting vinyl records. I use an astatic head and I cut into vinyl with a heated diamond stylus. I basically cobbled my machine together from a bunch of others and 3D printed parts.
If you want to be able to play a vinyl cut record with a heavy phonograph tone arm, I recommend cutting on vinyl and THEN you should cast it in silicone and pour a copy in plastic. Pourable plastics from Smooth-on will work and have a shore hardness over 80, which means that the steel needle will wear down before the record--which is how it should be. Smooth on has instructions on their website for copying your own 78 records successfully with their products. It's worth a read.
That's the only way I've been able to make new phonograph 78 records so far.
Good luck
Jason
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
Donald Wilson, donniej on talking machine forum makes repros of rare 78s and does a great job doing it. This is by the one at a time method.
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
Hi,
I’ll second Kim Gutzke of customrecords.com for what you are looking for. A one-off disc is not inexpensive, however Kim offers a disc that will play on an acoustic gramophone. Kim is located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. He uses a Fairchild 740 Lathe outfitted with a Westrex 3DII cutterhead.
Here’s an example:
https://youtu.be/4sr4plZohiY
I’ll second Kim Gutzke of customrecords.com for what you are looking for. A one-off disc is not inexpensive, however Kim offers a disc that will play on an acoustic gramophone. Kim is located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. He uses a Fairchild 740 Lathe outfitted with a Westrex 3DII cutterhead.
Here’s an example:
https://youtu.be/4sr4plZohiY
- trailerparkjesus
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:55 pm
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
Interesting... Custom stylus for his westrex?Bill P wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2020 4:54 pmHi,
I’ll second Kim Gutzke of customrecords.com for what you are looking for. A one-off disc is not inexpensive, however Kim offers a disc that will play on an acoustic gramophone. Kim is located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. He uses a Fairchild 740 Lathe outfitted with a Westrex 3DII cutterhead.
Here’s an example:
https://youtu.be/4sr4plZohiY
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
I would think that Kim is using a custom stylus.
Kim has been dealing with professional disc recording equipment since the mid-1990s and he’s sold a lot of equipment.
Here’s another YouTube video that Kim has posted where he explains the gramophone record that he can provide:
https://youtu.be/g7GFcyshc7Q
Bill
Kim has been dealing with professional disc recording equipment since the mid-1990s and he’s sold a lot of equipment.
Here’s another YouTube video that Kim has posted where he explains the gramophone record that he can provide:
https://youtu.be/g7GFcyshc7Q
Bill
- farmersplow
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2021 3:43 am
- Location: Austria - Vienna
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
Hi Marc,
by chance I saw a crazy idea a few days ago. Somebody tried to copy a record with a silicone mold! What can I say, it worked fine to make a vinyl record out of acrylic. The result is certainly not hi-fi (but neither is a gramophone).
Since the acrylic is harder than the vinyl, it might work for your purpose. I admit it's very experimental, but that fits your installation.
So you need a 78-record vinyl record, use a casting compound to make a negative and then an acrylic record for your gramophone.
I have no idea if it will work, but it couldn't hurt to try?
Here is the link to the You-Tube video from TKOR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDwN41Px_sY
Nice greetings from Vienna
Thomas
by chance I saw a crazy idea a few days ago. Somebody tried to copy a record with a silicone mold! What can I say, it worked fine to make a vinyl record out of acrylic. The result is certainly not hi-fi (but neither is a gramophone).
Since the acrylic is harder than the vinyl, it might work for your purpose. I admit it's very experimental, but that fits your installation.
So you need a 78-record vinyl record, use a casting compound to make a negative and then an acrylic record for your gramophone.
I have no idea if it will work, but it couldn't hurt to try?
Here is the link to the You-Tube video from TKOR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDwN41Px_sY
Nice greetings from Vienna
Thomas
- recordmaker
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2022 7:02 pm
Re: Need modern record for handcranked Gramophone/Victrola
I have been making steel needle compatible 78 RPM record for 3 years and the production output is small as it is a molding process ( 10s of copies no minimum order )
I have been kept pretty busy so far with a couple of niche customers and some one off jobs. I now find it would be practical to produce these records staring from lacquer if any one has a true mono full depth 78 master that want to make a small number of copies then i would be interested in collaborating.
these are a fully finished and tested product playing for 70 plus times on a gramophone without serious wear ( shellac was always tested to 35 or more pays with out serious wear, according to C Bryson " The Gramophone Record 1935 ) so as good as the original material.
Regards From Sheffield
Duncan
I have been kept pretty busy so far with a couple of niche customers and some one off jobs. I now find it would be practical to produce these records staring from lacquer if any one has a true mono full depth 78 master that want to make a small number of copies then i would be interested in collaborating.
these are a fully finished and tested product playing for 70 plus times on a gramophone without serious wear ( shellac was always tested to 35 or more pays with out serious wear, according to C Bryson " The Gramophone Record 1935 ) so as good as the original material.
Regards From Sheffield
Duncan